The less the sound is compressed, the better it will get. For instance, a mp3 format song suffered lots of compressions. Much more than a CD, which was much more compressed than a vinyl, which is, obviously, so very much more compressed than a live show.
But unless having the money to make play any artist or a personal orchestra in your living-room whenever you want, the best way to listen to quality sounding music is to possess a record-player.
Detractors are quite predictable : “You can’t listen to your music everywhere you go”, “You can’t switch from one song to another”, “You have to change the sides”, “This is so troublesome”. And this very precise thing seems to be commonly accepted : “Do you realize? You have to pay for music!!”
Alright. First, to make live artists and so let them create, they will need money. Simple as that. And nobody would like to work as hard as some of them do without being able to lead a decent life. About the other arguments, music, like everything, is way nicer when you don’t get around with it everywhere, everytime, with anybody. Listening to an entire record, from the beginning to the end is, in fact, the real and only way to understand and feel pertinently the work that it is.
Vinyls are fashionnable again, more and more stores sell classic rock, pop, indie, jazz, rap, afrobeat music etc… And technology can satisfy everybody, some new record players can transfer the songs of a disc to a computer
Vinyls are, without any doubt, the best way to listen to records at home.
Neil Young agrees.